Timeline for Isn't the [grammar] tag too general or redundant?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2011 at 7:21 | comment | added | Troyen | @Lukman The more specific ones can be added, but I don't think the general one should be removed. There are people following that tag as a catch-all for finding grammar-related questions and completely removing it means they'd have to track a dozen more specific tags instead (including ones that may not have been created yet). It's not like we're filling up the existing tag slots right now. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 7:17 | comment | added | Lukman | But should regular members edit newcomers' questions to remove this tag and replace with specific ones? | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 7:15 | history | answered | Mark Hosang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |