4

I think the logo should be shifted slightly into the (1,1) direction (45 degrees), i.e. up and to the right. The bounding box may be centred perfectly, but the character inside the circle looks lopsided.

Edit.

It should be a bit more subtle than this, but the circle being 40x40 pixels (the あ being 22x22), a shift of one pixel up and one pixel to the right (or one pixel up) already looks better (to me):

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

  • I'm not sure about this... take a look: cl.ly/443L271w1n47 – Paweł Jun 8 '16 at 14:17
  • @Paweł I wonder if it'd be better when the あ go (x,y) = (0, -0.5). – broccoli forest Jun 8 '16 at 16:07
  • 1
    I imagine Earthliŋ was using traditional coordinates where (1,1) is up and to the right, not inverted coordinates where (1,1) is down and to the right. – snailcar Jun 8 '16 at 18:53
  • @snailplane Right, with (x,y) I meant x to the right and y up. (This is also what my vector graphics software uses.) I guess for HTML people use inverted coordinates, so that the origin is at the top left (rather than the bottom left)...? – Earthliŋ Jun 8 '16 at 20:08
  • What if you moved it up, but not to the right? – snailcar Jun 14 '16 at 13:56
  • @snailplane Added this option. I feel it should be somewhere between these two (maybe closer to the one you suggested). – Earthliŋ Jun 14 '16 at 14:28
  • Ooh, like up 0.75 pixels, right 0.25 pixels maybe? – snailcar Jun 15 '16 at 4:20
5

The left logo is how I think it should look, the right one is the current one (with centred bounding boxes). Small & large

enter image description here enter image description here

Relative to the old one (blue)

enter image description here

3

I personally have a feeling that the あ should go up a bit.

And when we're at it, I'd like to mention the font of あ too.

enter image description here

It seems that letter shape of the current design (on left) is a simple modification of that on earlier draft (on right), but the bottom part becomes a little cramped because of the protrusion.

I'd like to vote for replacing the font as in the original advice by HiruneDiver, so that it'd look more in. (I personally prefer 源ノ角ゴシック and 源柔ゴシック, but it doesn't matter.) If you're concerned about legibility, you could just keep the favicon size icon as the status quo (it's already different from bigger icon, isn't it?), because the problem is unnoticeable in smaller size.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .