I just found a new tag which seems rather redundant, so I think we should merge it into , but I'll first post here in case anybody has any thoughts on the matter.

Update. Thanks everyone for the feedback. is now merged into , and remains as a synonym, so that users searching for construction will find the tag.


1 Answer 1


Seconded! Going by this excellent answer grammar is "syntax and morphology", there is nothing under "grammar constructions" that couldn't go under grammar as construction questions are about syntax. But we also have a tag that serves a more specific purpose. I agree that is not necessary.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .