I sometimes get confused about what I should do in the review queues when a post is flagged as low quality. This is the example I'm currently thinking of.
Whilst the answer isn't great, and doesn't really answer the question, it's not hopelessly wrong either. I would normally either just ignore or possibly downvote something like that.
What confuses me is that the review queue gives me three options:
- Looks OK -- well it's not really okay so I don't want to select that option.
- Edit -- Editing will not improve this answer.
- Delete -- Seems extreme. I normally only flag for deletion if something is offensive or clearly spam.
I suppose the simple answer is just to skip it, but is that shirking responsibility? What is the threshold for not being low quality and clicking 'looks OK'? What is the threshold for being worthy of deletion? I was wondering what other people thought about these options and what the best course of action is in a case like this.