For those who don't know me, I'm Grace Note, a Community Manager for Stack Exchange Inc. It's a pleasure to meet you.

Every two months into a beta site's lifetime, the Community Team receives a set of questions from that period of time, which is used as part of an evaluation of the site's progress and quality. One of the major focuses of this evaluation is how our answers are compared to what can be found elsewhere on the internet, and by extension how discoverable we as a site are.

A consistent element I noticed while performing the most recent reviews for the past four months, is that discoverability of this site appears to be very low. Now, as a Japanese language site that is on an English-speaking network, this is already a difficult place to break into - you have to deal with managing two separate languages and the key elements of search tend to be in Japanese. But there are still some points that could use some improvement.

Perhaps one of the major points is information in images but not in the body. This is one example, wherein the character names and not even the series name is mentioned - a lot of important context is stored within the image. Even though some of the Japanese text is in the body text, it won't show up when searching under the character's name or the series - only if you decide to search for pirates specifically. This is pretty bad.

Another example is this question. Now, I have sympathy for the asker since the kanji is slightly obscured, but it still ends that we have a question that can't be found with the specific info. The answer contains (some) of the text, but that apparently didn't improve searchability a lot - I had a lot of difficulty being able to find this one.

It's not just images, though (and in examples like this one, there's enough data in the body and the answers to find it in both the mistaken split version and the correct combined version). This question, in numerous searches explicitly for the very text that is being asked, I've barely seen our site. In fact, our own tweet of the question showed up higher on Google in one particular search. I can't explain why - it actually mystifies me, but it's still fact. This is one of but many questions where we were just not easy to find at all, when searching for the exact question.

I posted this for two reasons - I want to bring attention to the community that there is this issue, for people to be aware. The traffic to Japanese Language and Usage is actually on a decline, and I feel that this poor searchability is part of the blame of this. The second reason is that I'd like to see what the community thinks for taking steps to address this. An obvious suggestion would be to ensure more of the context that is necessary from images is contained in text. But again, images aren't the only issue - we're still being harmed either because of actual mechanical points (does the furigana hurt us in its current implementation, for example?) or from writings and styles of the question. Think on what could be done to improve the site's findability, post your findings and discuss among your friends what can be done to help this site forge its way into the internet.

  • 3
    In order to answer this question, we need knowledge about Search Engine Optimization rather than knowledge about Japanese.
    – user458
    Apr 18, 2012 at 6:36
  • @sawa: Yes, that's true, but one could argue the point of the post is so we can get a bit better grasp on Search Engine Optimization...all the Japanese knowledge in the world won't help if this site gets scrapped before getting out of beta. Apr 26, 2012 at 0:54
  • 1
    @GraceNote: Question for you, are meta posts also indexed with the same priority as the main site questions/answers?
    – jkerian
    May 15, 2012 at 18:26

4 Answers 4


One other thing that may be an issue that I've noticed is sometimes there are vague titles to questions, like this one, this one, or this one.

I don't think this is a particularly common problem, but maybe if we try to be a bit more conscience of question titles to make them a bit more search-engine friendly.

  • 1
    Feel free to edit titles after the fact. If you don't have the needed rep, feel free to make suggestions. (the mods and higher-rep people around here are pretty active)
    – jkerian
    Sep 27, 2012 at 18:51

I wonder if we have a synonym problem.

When I search for one of my questions using the phrase "what is the difference between の and こと" I get my topic as the first hit, followed by several unrelated JLU questions.

If I try the similar search "when can I use こと instead of の?" that question is nowhere in sight. Comparing the first hit, a Yahoo answers question, my topic is missing the word "instead", but "の" and "こと" are mentioned quite a bit more in Derek's answer. The cached view has "の" and "こと" show up highlighted, so they don't seem to be words that Google excludes from my search (such as "when" or "the"). Perhaps since most of my search terms were in English, it gave greater weight to the English keywords?

At any rate, there are a lot of different ways to rephrase the questions we have here, but for which we don't show up in the list of results.

A second issue, perhaps related to SEO, is that the tags we use to classify questions aren't words people will be searching for when they are trying to look for these questions, unlike sites like StackOverflow or Gaming. For example, if I wanted to know why some people drop the "u" sound in 〜ます verbs, I probably wouldn't use the word "phonology" in my search terms. Yet, tagging the question with "phonology" makes perfect sense to users of the site, and so it shows up as the first word of the title. Some of the other sites have also complained about this.

  • 1
    I think your second point is definitely something we should look into. Making this site more accessible by bringing down the level of technical terms a bit is a good thing IMO +1 Apr 21, 2012 at 12:56

One way of making the search results more available to Google could be to use Romaji alongside key words. Although I'm personally not a big fan of Romaji, I don't think it can be denied that many people use Romaji over Hiragana/Katakana/Kanji when searching on Google (especially for Japanese grammar points, which I think is a fairly large part of this site.) For example, I think it would be just as likely, if not more, that people will search for "what is the difference between no and koto" rather than "what is the difference between and こと" (in which case I currently get a whole bunch of results which I think aren't as good as the answer here.)

On the other hand, if you search for e.g. "what's the difference between tonikaku and ichiou", it ranked fairly highly for me, as one of the answerers wrote the two in Romaji in their answer. (I think it's likely that it would've been higher if romaji was included in the question itself though.)

I think that's one of the reasons that Japanese at About.com does so well in Google results, as it includes Romaji as well as the Japanese script, e.g. it lists "Arigatou gozaimasu" as well as ありがとうございます in this page.

I don't know whether there could be some kind of automatic conversion to Romaji or not (if Romaji was decided upon.) As a demo, I built a proxy server which uses Mecab to convert Japanese to Romaji alongside the Japanese locally and tried it on this site, and it for the most part works, but there are a notable number of exceptions.

The other potential problem is Furigana, as has been outlined. I think it's likely that writing something as 行{​い​}きます would make things difficult for indexers because of the way Japanese sentences need to be broken up and analyzed. I don't know how Google handles <ruby> tags, but maybe actually serving ruby server-side might be an option? I'm not sure.

I don't think that text in images is a major problem for this site. As far as I know, there are only a few questions which suffer from this problem. The solution may be to edit those articles and add the text underneath as a blockquote etc.

Anyway, I'm not saying we should go with any of these options at this point, but I hope we can have some more dialog about where to go from here. This site, in my opinion, has higher quality answers than many other sites, and I think it would be great if more people were able to find them.

  • While the idea deserves consideration, I think it can be denied that people use Romaji for google searches. I honestly don't know what the stats might be, but I think if we are talking real Japanese language students (as opposed to people who may have heard one word somewhere in a show and wonder what it means), kana is just as possible as romaji... Anyway, if we were to consider Romaji a useful SEO addition, then I think it's up to SE to add some basic transliteration script to add romaji keywords to posts.
    – Dave
    Apr 19, 2012 at 7:26
  • 3
    On the other hand, I fully support the inclusion of proper Ruby support (currently, this is done in a very hackish way).
    – Dave
    Apr 19, 2012 at 7:27
  • @Dave I do think that any real Japanese language student should learn/know kana, but are these the only people we should cater too? They probably make up a large majority of our registered userbase, but part of this problem is that non-users aren't finding us. I think excluding the large group of people who know romaji rather than kana is the wrong way to go if we are having issues being found. Even if they aren't very serious Japanese learners, they are still potential site visitors.
    – atlantiza
    Apr 19, 2012 at 7:33
  • hmm... I guess at the end of day it's difficult to draw any conclusions about Romaji/Furigana etc without hard data. The only thing I can think of now is maybe an analysis of what kind of queries people are entering into Google using the HTTP referer, and possibly try to improve based on that.
    – cypher
    Apr 23, 2012 at 10:12
  • Google still fails to index words that are broken up by ruby, at least the way we do it. What if we worked around the problem? We could avoid breaking up words (at least in question titles) by writing 行きます followed by 【いきます】. It does look slightly strange, but I've seen other people write furigana like that without any major objections. Plus, if we use 【】, it looks nice in Google results :-)
    – user1478
    Mar 13, 2013 at 10:11
  • @snailplane I agree that whole words should be shown to Google and used in the Furigana engine, but I think it'd be good if we keep the appearance similar to what we have now (if at all possible). I've gone into this a bit at meta.japanese.stackexchange.com/a/1024/796.
    – cypher
    Mar 13, 2013 at 23:41

To add my two cents, I think we may have a problem due to a lot if sites that are like grammar libraries on the internet, that if people are searching for "Japanese Grammar", they are more likely going to find these types of sites. I mean sites like renshuu.org, Tae Kim's Guide, JGram, and Tanos.co.uk. I think they're helpful tools for reference, and I'm sure they get a lot more hits, and they'll turn up in more vague searches, like "help with Japanese grammar" or what-not.

I know I personally found this site when I searched for a very specific question.

I have no idea how something like this would work, or if it would be effective, but I think we would benefit by having some aspect of the site that would draw people who are more vague in their searches. That may also be what Troyen was saying. Again, I'm not sure how this would work.

  • Or we could just go to those sites and post links to us in the comments section. But, do we really want to be "that site"? Apr 21, 2012 at 13:10
  • 1
    Maybe we could have an "index of grammar" post in meta or something which has sections for links to questions about each particle/adjectives etc to allow easier finding in one place for people to link to? It'd probably be a lot of work to build+maintain though. I think a major problem could possibly be that people aren't linking to us, and as a result Google doesn't rank us as highly (and vice-versa, which makes it a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem.) I'd have no idea where to start in fixing such a problem though.
    – cypher
    Apr 23, 2012 at 7:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .