Timeline for Why was this answer suggested as a "low quality post" by the system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021 at 18:58 | answer | added | Eddie Kal | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 3, 2021 at 18:25 | history | edited | Eddie Kal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 139 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2021 at 18:25 | comment | added | Eddie Kal | @ajsmart I did a bit of research today and found this, well, dunno what to say. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 18:02 | comment | added | ajsmart | @EddieKal Have the Stack Exchange developers made the criteria for the 'low quality post' flagging algorithm public? I was unaware of any capabilities by the moderators/high rep users to adjust the algorithm. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 16:16 | comment | added | Eddie Kal | @ajsmart Also I noticed comments in Japanese on this site appear longer and bulkier than what I was used to but only because of Japanese characters being fullwidth. Doing a rough character count, I still think that answer is longer than what the system usually feeds to the low quality review queue on an English language site. I could be wrong. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 13:14 | comment | added | ajsmart | More often than not I find it's an issue of how long the post is (in characters) that trips the system. It's easier to say more with fewer characters in Japanese. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 12:28 | comment | added | broccoli forest | The low quality low quality detection system. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 3:40 | history | asked | Eddie Kal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |